







We are proud to be a menber if ILGA
|
|

This painting is
now
our symbol. Painted by Mary Moon, it
represents our ever-changing diversity, sometimes stormy,
sometimes calm, we are all mixed together to make a beautiful
painting in God's image

This symbol,
made by Fionnaigh, so aptly describes that we are all made in God's
image no matter what our sexuality.
|
GalaXies
is a Christian-ish spiritual community for lesbians, gay men, bisexuals
and
transgender people, and our mates!
Our
spiritual core is
what we have found to be of value, affirming, truthful and
fun. In
enjoying ourselves, seeking, interpreting God freshly, we embrace the
diversity of other spiritual paths.
Our Sunday
evening
services are a relaxed journey, creative, rewarding, renewing, casual,
beyond ourselves. We are all learning ...
|
Starting the New Year with "I Do": New Hampshire Recognises Same-Sex Marriages from Midnight (1/12010)
New Hampshire's gay and lesbian couples are expected to gather
throughout the night to ring in the start of the new year with
champagne and wedding bells as New Hampshire's gay marriage law takes
effect at midnight.
The law, which was signed by Governor John Lynch in June, 2009,
won't grant gay and lesbian couples any more rights than they currently
have under the state's civil union law, but it will give them equal
access to the term "marriage".
Symbolically this is important,
but more than that, when the federal Defense of Marriage Act is
repealed, having access to terms like "marriage" and "spouse" will be
helpful from a legal standpoint and could mean that New Hampshire's
married gay and lesbian couples might finally have access to the 1150+ benefits that are given to heterosexual unions but are currently denied gay and lesbian partners.
The
New Hampshire gay marriage bill was amended during the legislative
process so that it expressly states a religious institution's right to
decline to marry gay and lesbian couples. Religious organizations can
also deny couples affiliated services such as wedding photography and
the like.
A handful of gay and lesbian couples have said that they will gather just after midnight at the Statehouse in Concord
to have their civil marriage ceremony performed, echoing the events of
two years ago when many couples journeyed to the Statehouse to have
their civil union ceremony at this time in 2008. Claire Ebel, executive
director of the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union, will officiate.
The Los Angeles Times has an insightful piece today
in which they interview several of New Hampshire's gay and lesbian
residents regarding the new marriage law. Some will marry just after
midnight at one of the many events being held to celebrate the law's
coming into effect, while others, who have had various partnership
celebrations in the past, such as commitment ceremonies and civil
unions, plan to wait until later in the year, preferring to take a
little more time to plan their wedding.
The Los Angeles Times
notes that New Hampshire's gay and lesbian couples that were previously
joined in civil unions do not actually need to go through a wedding
ceremony in order to be married. This is because New Hampshire's civil
unions will be converted into civil marriages by 2011. After December
31, 2010, the state will no longer issue civil union licenses.
Overall, 2009 has been a mixed year for gay marriage. California's Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8
which meant gay marriages would no longer be recognized after they were
briefly legalized in 2008 following a court ruling that struck down a
previous constitutional ban. A court case will begin in January in which lawyers will argue that Proposition 8 is itself unconstitutional.
Also in 2009, Maine lawmakers approved gay marriage, but then voters decided to block the law at the ballot despite a very strong campaign from gay rights advocates.
After a long wait, the New York Senate voted to block gay marriage legislation, while a vote on gay marriage in New Jersey is still pending.
Yet, at the same time, District of Columbia's Council voted to recognize gay marriages from out of state, and in December also chose to allow gay marriages. However, the bill must first clear Congress before it becomes law. Congress are likely to take up the issue early in 2010.
Vermont legislators also legalized gay marriage in 2009, while Iowa's Supreme Court overturned a ban on gay marriage, finding it unconstitutional. Many conservative Iowans have called for a referendum on gay marriage in 2010, mindful that gay marriage has never won at the ballot. Iowan Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal has said that he will not allow any bill that would block gay marriage to come to the floor, however.
As ever, gay marriage remains a hot-topic issue for many, and will no doubt be just as controversial in 2010 as it was in 2009.
All
that said, New Hampshire is starting 2010 with a new level of
recognition for its lesbian and gay couples, and although this gift is
not quite complete while the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
remains in place, and it will most likely still be in place until 2011 at least, it is a positive way to begin 2010 and to celebrate a new year in which even more steps toward full equality can be made.
You can do it in Argentina: Latin America's First Gay Civil Wedding Ceremony.
You may remember the story of Alex Freyre and Jose Maria di Bello, two
Argentine men, both HIV+, who wanted to marry on December 1, World Aids
Day. Earlier in the year the couple had managed to secure permission to
marry from a Buenos Aires court after a judge ruled that the civil code
ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.
The ruling was
immediately challenged by another judge who, although not disagreeing
with the couple's right to marry as such, disputed the lower court's
ability to strike down an aspect of the civil code, even if the ruling
had only limited power to grant same-sex couples in Argentina's capital
the ability to appeal their right for a marriage license. The judge,
Gabriela Seijas, filed an injunction and the couple were made to wait. You can read the full story here.
However,
because the injunction only applied to Buenos Aires itself, the couple
decided to search for another region to marry in, realizing that, so
long as the area's officials agreed, the marriage could still go ahead.
CNN reports:
In Argentina, the issue of same-sex marriage is decided on the local and state level.
So Freyre and di Bello went to the
southernmost state of Tierra del Fuego, where a pro-gay marriage
governor welcomed the event, Telam reported.
Although the federal government
could not directly intervene, Argentina's National Institute Against
Xenophobia and Racism (INADI) helped find a friendly jurisdiction where
the couple could have their wedding...
The governor of Tierra del Fuego, Fabiana Rios, issued a special decree
allowing the marriage. She cited that, although Argentina's civil code
bans gay marriage by definition, the Argentine Constitution does not, and therefore it was within her power
to allow the marriage to proceed, saying that same-sex marriage was "an
important advance in human rights and social inclusion".
Alex Freyre and Jose Maria di Bello were married on Monday in what is believed to be a first for Latin America.
Roman
Catholic leaders have condemned the marriage, with Bishop Juan Carlos
of the city of Rio Gallegos calling the marriage "an attack against the
survival of the human species".
This isn't the end of the
matter, however. Argentina's top court has chosen to examine the
couple's case and will report their findings next year. At this time it
is unclear if the court will take on the question of the legality of
banning same-sex marriage, or if they will instead limit their focus to
this one case in point and whether the judge who originally overturned
the ban had the power to do so.
If the court upholds the ban,
Alex Freyre and Jose Maria di Bello's marriage may be nullified.
However, should the court decide that the original judge was correct,
and therein agree that the ban on same-sex marriage is
unconstitutional, the court's decision may have wider implications.
Argentina's lawmakers are currently debating a bill
that would allow gay marriage. It is hotly opposed by political and
religious conservatives and is not expected to pass. Greater support
exists for civil partnerships, although they too draw controversy.
Despite
this, one half of the married couple, Jose Maria Di Bello, has
expressed hope that his marriage could be a symbol for change
throughout Latin America and beyond, saying:
"I want this union to symbolise that
this point, the further south in the world, is the end of the world,
but also the beginning of everything, and from Ushuaia, the city
further south in the world, and from Argentina, we are shedding light
to the whole of Latin America and the Caribbean."
John
Shelby Spong - The time has come!
Thursday October 15, 2009
A
Manifesto! The Time Has Come!
I have
made a decision.
I will
no longer debate the issue of homosexuality in the church with
anyone.
I will
no longer engage the biblical ignorance that emanates from so many
right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if
that point of view still has any credibility.
I will
no longer discuss with them or listen to them tell me how homosexuality
is "an abomination to God," about how homosexuality is a "chosen
lifestyle," or about how through prayer and "spiritual counseling"
homosexual persons can be "cured." Those arguments are no longer worthy
of my time or energy.
I will
no longer dignify by listening to the thoughts of those who advocate
"reparative therapy," as if homosexual persons are somehow broken and
need to be repaired.
I
will no longer talk to those who believe that the unity of
the church can or should be achieved by rejecting the presence of, or
at least at the expense of, gay and lesbian people.
I will
no longer take the time to refute the unlearned and undocumentable
claims of certain world religious leaders who call homosexuality
"deviant."
I will
no longer listen to that pious sentimentality that certain Christian
leaders continue to employ, which suggests some version of that strange
and overtly dishonest phrase that "we love the sinner but hate the
sin." That statement is, I have concluded, nothing more than a
self-serving lie designed to cover the fact that
these people hate homosexual persons and fear homosexuality itself, but
somehow know that hatred is incompatible with the Christ they claim to
profess, so they adopt this face-saving and absolutely false statement.
I will
no longer temper my understanding of truth in order to pretend that I
have even a tiny smidgen of respect for the appalling negativity that
continues to emanate from religious circles where the church has for
centuries conveniently perfumed its ongoing prejudices against blacks,
Jews, women and homosexual persons with what it assumes is
"high-sounding, pious rhetoric." The day for that mentality has quite
simply come to an end for me.
I will
personally neither tolerate it nor listen to it any longer. The world
has moved on, leaving these elements of the Christian Church that
cannot adjust to new knowledge or a new consciousness lost in a sea of
their own irrelevance. They no longer talk to anyone but themselves.
I will
no longer seek to slow down the witness to inclusiveness by pretending
that there is some middle ground between prejudice and oppression.
There isn't. Justice postponed is justice denied. That can be a resting
place no longer for anyone. An old civil rights song proclaimed that
the only choice awaiting those who cannot adjust to a new understanding
was to "Roll on over or we'll roll on over you!" Time waits for no one.
I will
particularly ignore those members of my own Episcopal Church who seek
to break away from this body to form a "new church," claiming that this
new and bigoted instrument alone now represents the Anglican Communion.
Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic
human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer
exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay
people, distort gay people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be part
of a religious fellowship in which they can continue to feel justified
in their homophobic prejudices for the rest of their tortured lives.
Church unity can never be a virtue that is preserved by allowing
injustice, oppression and psychological tyranny to go unchallenged.
In my
personal life, I will no longer listen to televised debates conducted
by "fair-minded" channels that seek to give "both sides" of this issue
"equal time." I am aware that these stations no longer give equal time
to the advocates of treating women as if they are the property of men
or to the advocates of reinstating either segregation or slavery,
despite the fact that when these evil institutions were coming to an
end the Bible was still being quoted frequently on each of these
subjects. It is time for the media to announce that there are no longer
two sides to the issue of full humanity for gay and lesbian people.
There is no way that justice for homosexual people can be compromised
any longer.
I will
no longer act as if the Papal office is to be respected if the present
occupant of that office is either not willing or not able to inform and
educate himself on public issues on which he dares to speak with
embarrassing ineptitude. I will no longer be respectful of the
leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who seems to believe that
rude behavior, intolerance and even killing prejudice is somehow
acceptable, so long as it comes from third-world religious leaders, who
more than anything else reveal in themselves the price that colonial
oppression has required of the minds and hearts of so many of our
world's population. I see no way that ignorance and truth can be placed
side by side, nor do I believe that evil is somehow less evil if the
Bible is quoted to justify it. I will dismiss as unworthy of any more
of my attention the wild, false and uninformed opinions of such
would-be religious leaders as Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry
Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, Albert Mohler, and Robert Duncan. My country
and my church have both already spent too much time, energy and money
trying to accommodate these backward points of view when they are no
longer even tolerable.
I make
these statements because it is time to move on. The battle is over. The
victory has been won. There is no reasonable doubt as to what the final
outcome of this struggle will be. Homosexual people will be accepted as
equal, full human beings, who have a legitimate claim on every right
that both church and society have to offer any of us. Homosexual
marriages will become legal, recognized by the state and pronounced
holy by the church. "Don't ask, don't tell" will be dismantled as the
policy of our armed forces. We will and we must learn that equality of
citizenship is not something that should ever be submitted to a
referendum. Equality under and before the law is a solemn promise
conveyed to all our citizens in the Constitution itself. Can any of us
imagine having a public referendum on whether slavery should continue,
whether segregation should be dismantled, whether voting privileges
should be offered to women? The time has come for politicians to stop
hiding behind unjust laws that they themselves helped to enact, and to
abandon that convenient shield of demanding a vote on the rights of
full citizenship because they do not understand the difference between
a constitutional democracy, which this nation has, and a "mobocracy,"
which this nation rejected when it adopted its constitution. We do not
put the civil rights of a minority to the vote of a
plebiscite.
I will
also no longer act as if I need a majority vote of some ecclesiastical
body in order to bless, ordain, recognize and celebrate the lives and
gifts of gay and lesbian people in the life of the church. No one
should ever again be forced to submit the privilege of citizenship in
this nation or membership in the Christian Church to the will of a
majority vote.
The
battle in both our culture and our church to rid our souls of this
dying prejudice is finished. A new consciousness has arisen. A decision
has quite clearly been made. Inequality for gay and lesbian people is
no longer a debatable issue in either church or state. Therefore, I
will from this moment on refuse to dignify the continued public
expression of ignorant prejudice by engaging it. I do not tolerate
racism or sexism any longer. From this moment on, I will no longer
tolerate our culture's various forms of homophobia. I do not care who
it is who articulates these attitudes or who tries to make them sound
holy with religious jargon.
I have
been part of this debate for years, but things do get settled and this
issue is now settled for me. I do not debate any longer with members of
the "Flat Earth Society" either. I do not debate with people who think
we should treat epilepsy by casting demons out of the epileptic person;
I do not waste time engaging those medical opinions that suggest that
bleeding the patient might release the infection. I do not converse
with people who think that Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans as
punishment for the sin of being the birthplace of Ellen DeGeneres or
that the terrorists hit the United Sates on 9/11 because we tolerated
homosexual people, abortions, feminism or the American Civil Liberties
Union. I am tired of being embarrassed by so much of my church's
participation in causes that are quite unworthy of the Christ I serve
or the God whose mystery and wonder I appreciate more each day. Indeed
I feel the Christian Church should not only apologize, but do public
penance for the way we have treated people of color, women, adherents
of other religions and those we designated heretics, as well as gay and
lesbian people.
Life
moves on. As the poet James Russell Lowell once put it more than a
century ago: "New occasions teach new duties, Time makes ancient good
uncouth." I am ready now to claim the victory. I will from now on
assume it and live into it. I am unwilling to argue about it or to
discuss it as if there are two equally valid, competing positions any
longer. The day for that mentality has simply gone forever.
This is
my manifesto and my creed. I proclaim it today. I invite others to join
me in this public declaration. I believe that such a public outpouring
will help cleanse both the church and this nation of its own distorting
past. It will restore integrity and honor to both church and state. It
will signal that a new day has dawned and we are ready not just to
embrace it, but also to rejoice in it and to celebrate it.
– John
Shelby Spong
|
GalaXies
is an incorporated society. See our objectives.
GalaXies
provides:
Meetings: We meet on
the fourth Sunday of the month
St. Andrew's on The Terrace
(Upstairs Common
Room)
30 The Terrace, Wellington
Time: 17:30
starting with a shared
meal. cafe style.
To
get in touch with GalaXies, see contacts.
You’re
concerned about what the Bible says or what some people think it says?
See our list of helpful websites
for commentaries which are based on the historical/critical method of
interpreting the Bible.
|
As part of our
incorporation as a society in 1994, we were required to
provide rules for what we would do. Part of this was a set of
objectives. In August 2000 we looked at these again, and
decided that they
still worked for us.
The objectives are:
- To provide affirming
worship for lesbians, gay men and bisexual, their families and friends
who are Christian or of Christian origin.
- To provide worship
which is inclusive of all who wish to nurture and develop their
spirituality.
- To provide
opportunities for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals to explore faith
through retreats, seminars and workshops.
- To foster support for
gay men, lesbians and bisexuals in and beyond Wellington.
Who are we?
We are an ecumenical
Christian congregation comprised primarily of lesbians
and gay men, although there are a growing number of straight refugees
from other
congregations joining us. We are committed to the priesthood of all
believers,
and our services are led from within the group.
We recognise common
ground between Christianity and other spiritualities and
their different approaches. We are non-judgemantal and open
in theology.
Inclusive language,
concepts and stories
Becasue of the history of
homophobia in society and the Church's negative
attitude to homosexuality, lesbians and gay men experience a range of
difficult
problems in personal and spiritual development.
A few churches are
beginning to appreciate the hetrosexual bias in the
language, concepts and stories used in worship. For the most
part,
however, appropriate affirmation and spiritual nourishment are lacking.
The services offfered by Galaxies attempt
to meet
this need
and are
developing content and forms of worship which might be used by churches
as they
become more inclusive.
They are also providing
an outreach to gay men and lesbians of no church
background who wish to develop their spirituality and find a way to
affirm
values in their lives.
Spirituality - Growing
towards potential being.
For this Galaxies offers:
- A focus on values, on
God.
- A community in which
to find meaning, claim authority, express gay and lesbian culture.
- Liturgy for the
expression and celebration of values.
- Workshops for
spiritual development.
|