GalaXies Home

Home
Services
Liturgy Resources
Contacts
Links
Advocacy
Gay & Lesbian Fair

ILGA Logo
We are proud to be a menber if ILGA

coloured ripplies of water like the corner of a setting sun on the sea.

This painting is now our symbol.  Painted by Mary Moon, it represents our ever-changing diversity,  sometimes stormy, sometimes calm, we are  all mixed together to make a beautiful painting in God's image 

Rainbow people logo - Made in God's image

This symbol, made by Fionnaigh, so aptly describes that we are all made in God's image no matter what our sexuality.

GalaXies is a Christian-ish spiritual community for lesbians, gay men, bisexuals and transgender people, and our mates! 

Our spiritual core is what we have found to be of value, affirming, truthful and fun. In enjoying ourselves, seeking, interpreting God freshly, we embrace the diversity of other spiritual paths. 

Our Sunday evening services are a relaxed journey, creative, rewarding, renewing, casual, beyond ourselves. We are all learning ...

Starting the New Year with "I Do": New Hampshire Recognises Same-Sex Marriages from Midnight (1/12010)

New Hampshire's gay and lesbian couples are expected to gather throughout the night to ring in the start of the new year with champagne and wedding bells as New Hampshire's gay marriage law takes effect at midnight.

The law, which was signed by Governor John Lynch in June, 2009, won't grant gay and lesbian couples any more rights than they currently have under the state's civil union law, but it will give them equal access to the term "marriage".

Symbolically this is important, but more than that, when the federal Defense of Marriage Act is repealed, having access to terms like "marriage" and "spouse" will be helpful from a legal standpoint and could mean that New Hampshire's married gay and lesbian couples might finally have access to the 1150+ benefits that are given to heterosexual unions but are currently denied gay and lesbian partners.

The New Hampshire gay marriage bill was amended during the legislative process so that it expressly states a religious institution's right to decline to marry gay and lesbian couples. Religious organizations can also deny couples affiliated services such as wedding photography and the like.

A handful of gay and lesbian couples have said that they will gather just after midnight at the Statehouse in Concord to have their civil marriage ceremony performed, echoing the events of two years ago when many couples journeyed to the Statehouse to have their civil union ceremony at this time in 2008. Claire Ebel, executive director of the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union, will officiate.

The Los Angeles Times has an insightful piece today in which they interview several of New Hampshire's gay and lesbian residents regarding the new marriage law. Some will marry just after midnight at one of the many events being held to celebrate the law's coming into effect, while others, who have had various partnership celebrations in the past, such as commitment ceremonies and civil unions, plan to wait until later in the year, preferring to take a little more time to plan their wedding.

The Los Angeles Times notes that New Hampshire's gay and lesbian couples that were previously joined in civil unions do not actually need to go through a wedding ceremony in order to be married. This is because New Hampshire's civil unions will be converted into civil marriages by 2011. After December 31, 2010, the state will no longer issue civil union licenses.  

Overall, 2009 has been a mixed year for gay marriage. California's Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8 which meant gay marriages would no longer be recognized after they were briefly legalized in 2008 following a court ruling that struck down a previous constitutional ban. A court case will begin in January in which lawyers will argue that Proposition 8 is itself unconstitutional.

Also in 2009, Maine lawmakers approved gay marriage, but then voters decided to block the law at the ballot despite a very strong campaign from gay rights advocates.

After a long wait, the New York Senate voted to block gay marriage legislation, while a vote on gay marriage in New Jersey is still pending.

Yet, at the same time, District of Columbia's Council voted to recognize gay marriages from out of state, and in December also chose to allow gay marriages. However, the bill must first clear Congress before it becomes law. Congress are likely to take up the issue early in 2010.

Vermont legislators also legalized gay marriage in 2009, while Iowa's Supreme Court overturned a ban on gay marriage, finding it unconstitutional. Many conservative Iowans have called for a referendum on gay marriage in 2010, mindful that gay marriage has never won at the ballot. Iowan Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal has said that he will not allow any bill that would block gay marriage to come to the floor, however.

As ever, gay marriage remains a hot-topic issue for many, and will no doubt be just as controversial in 2010 as it was in 2009.

All that said, New Hampshire is starting 2010 with a new level of recognition for its lesbian and gay couples, and although this gift is not quite complete while the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) remains in place, and it will most likely still be in place until 2011 at least, it is a positive way to begin 2010 and to celebrate a new year in which even more steps toward full equality can be made.

You can do it in Argentina: Latin America's First Gay Civil Wedding Ceremony.

You may remember the story of Alex Freyre and Jose Maria di Bello, two Argentine men, both HIV+, who wanted to marry on December 1, World Aids Day. Earlier in the year the couple had managed to secure permission to marry from a Buenos Aires court after a judge ruled that the civil code ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.

The ruling was immediately challenged by another judge who, although not disagreeing with the couple's right to marry as such, disputed the lower court's ability to strike down an aspect of the civil code, even if the ruling had only limited power to grant same-sex couples in Argentina's capital the ability to appeal their right for a marriage license. The judge, Gabriela Seijas, filed an injunction and the couple were made to wait. You can read the full story here.

However, because the injunction only applied to Buenos Aires itself, the couple decided to search for another region to marry in, realizing that, so long as the area's officials agreed, the marriage could still go ahead. CNN reports:

In Argentina, the issue of same-sex marriage is decided on the local and state level.

So Freyre and di Bello went to the southernmost state of Tierra del Fuego, where a pro-gay marriage governor welcomed the event, Telam reported.

Although the federal government could not directly intervene, Argentina's National Institute Against Xenophobia and Racism (INADI) helped find a friendly jurisdiction where the couple could have their wedding...

The governor of Tierra del Fuego, Fabiana Rios, issued a special decree allowing the marriage. She cited that, although Argentina's civil code bans gay marriage by definition, the Argentine Constitution does not, and therefore it was within her power to allow the marriage to proceed, saying that same-sex marriage was "an important advance in human rights and social inclusion".

Alex Freyre and Jose Maria di Bello were married on Monday in what is believed to be a first for Latin America.

Roman Catholic leaders have condemned the marriage, with Bishop Juan Carlos of the city of Rio Gallegos calling the marriage "an attack against the survival of the human species".

This isn't the end of the matter, however. Argentina's top court has chosen to examine the couple's case and will report their findings next year. At this time it is unclear if the court will take on the question of the legality of banning same-sex marriage, or if they will instead limit their focus to this one case in point and whether the judge who originally overturned the ban had the power to do so.

If the court upholds the ban, Alex Freyre and Jose Maria di Bello's marriage may be nullified. However, should the court decide that the original judge was correct, and therein agree that the ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, the court's decision may have wider implications.

Argentina's lawmakers are currently debating a bill that would allow gay marriage. It is hotly opposed by political and religious conservatives and is not expected to pass. Greater support exists for civil partnerships, although they too draw controversy.

Despite this, one half of the married couple, Jose Maria Di Bello, has expressed hope that his marriage could be a symbol for change throughout Latin America and beyond, saying:

"I want this union to symbolise that this point, the further south in the world, is the end of the world, but also the beginning of everything, and from Ushuaia, the city further south in the world, and from Argentina, we are shedding light to the whole of Latin America and the Caribbean."

John Shelby Spong - The time has come!

Thursday October 15, 2009

A Manifesto! The Time Has Come!

I have made a decision.

I will no longer debate the issue of homosexuality in the church with anyone. 

I will no longer engage the biblical ignorance that emanates from so many right-wing Christians about how the Bible condemns homosexuality, as if that point of view still has any credibility.

I will no longer discuss with them or listen to them tell me how homosexuality is "an abomination to God," about how homosexuality is a "chosen lifestyle," or about how through prayer and "spiritual counseling" homosexual persons can be "cured." Those arguments are no longer worthy of my time or energy.

I will no longer dignify by listening to the thoughts of those who advocate "reparative therapy," as if homosexual persons are somehow broken and need to be repaired.

I  will no longer talk to those who believe that the unity of the church can or should be achieved by rejecting the presence of, or at least at the expense of, gay and lesbian people.

I will no longer take the time to refute the unlearned and undocumentable claims of certain world religious leaders who call homosexuality "deviant."

I will no longer listen to that pious sentimentality that certain Christian leaders continue to employ, which suggests some version of that strange and overtly dishonest phrase that "we love the sinner but hate the sin." That statement is, I have concluded, nothing more than a self-serving lie designed to cover the fact that these people hate homosexual persons and fear homosexuality itself, but somehow know that hatred is incompatible with the Christ they claim to profess, so they adopt this face-saving and absolutely false statement.

I will no longer temper my understanding of truth in order to pretend that I have even a tiny smidgen of respect for the appalling negativity that continues to emanate from religious circles where the church has for centuries conveniently perfumed its ongoing prejudices against blacks, Jews, women and homosexual persons with what it assumes is "high-sounding, pious rhetoric." The day for that mentality has quite simply come to an end for me.

I will personally neither tolerate it nor listen to it any longer. The world has moved on, leaving these elements of the Christian Church that cannot adjust to new knowledge or a new consciousness lost in a sea of their own irrelevance. They no longer talk to anyone but themselves.

I will no longer seek to slow down the witness to inclusiveness by pretending that there is some middle ground between prejudice and oppression. There isn't. Justice postponed is justice denied. That can be a resting place no longer for anyone. An old civil rights song proclaimed that the only choice awaiting those who cannot adjust to a new understanding was to "Roll on over or we'll roll on over you!" Time waits for no one.

I will particularly ignore those members of my own Episcopal Church who seek to break away from this body to form a "new church," claiming that this new and bigoted instrument alone now represents the Anglican Communion. Such a new ecclesiastical body is designed to allow these pathetic human beings, who are so deeply locked into a world that no longer exists, to form a community in which they can continue to hate gay people, distort gay people with their hopeless rhetoric and to be part of a religious fellowship in which they can continue to feel justified in their homophobic prejudices for the rest of their tortured lives. Church unity can never be a virtue that is preserved by allowing injustice, oppression and psychological tyranny to go unchallenged.

In my personal life, I will no longer listen to televised debates conducted by "fair-minded" channels that seek to give "both sides" of this issue "equal time." I am aware that these stations no longer give equal time to the advocates of treating women as if they are the property of men or to the advocates of reinstating either segregation or slavery, despite the fact that when these evil institutions were coming to an end the Bible was still being quoted frequently on each of these subjects. It is time for the media to announce that there are no longer two sides to the issue of full humanity for gay and lesbian people. There is no way that justice for homosexual people can be compromised any longer. 

I will no longer act as if the Papal office is to be respected if the present occupant of that office is either not willing or not able to inform and educate himself on public issues on which he dares to speak with embarrassing ineptitude. I will no longer be respectful of the leadership of the Archbishop of Canterbury, who seems to believe that rude behavior, intolerance and even killing prejudice is somehow acceptable, so long as it comes from third-world religious leaders, who more than anything else reveal in themselves the price that colonial oppression has required of the minds and hearts of so many of our world's population. I see no way that ignorance and truth can be placed side by side, nor do I believe that evil is somehow less evil if the Bible is quoted to justify it. I will dismiss as unworthy of any more of my attention the wild, false and uninformed opinions of such would-be religious leaders as Pat Robertson, James Dobson, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart, Albert Mohler, and Robert Duncan. My country and my church have both already spent too much time, energy and money trying to accommodate these backward points of view when they are no longer even tolerable. 

I make these statements because it is time to move on. The battle is over. The victory has been won. There is no reasonable doubt as to what the final outcome of this struggle will be. Homosexual people will be accepted as equal, full human beings, who have a legitimate claim on every right that both church and society have to offer any of us. Homosexual marriages will become legal, recognized by the state and pronounced holy by the church. "Don't ask, don't tell" will be dismantled as the policy of our armed forces. We will and we must learn that equality of citizenship is not something that should ever be submitted to a referendum. Equality under and before the law is a solemn promise conveyed to all our citizens in the Constitution itself. Can any of us imagine having a public referendum on whether slavery should continue, whether segregation should be dismantled, whether voting privileges should be offered to women? The time has come for politicians to stop hiding behind unjust laws that they themselves helped to enact, and to abandon that convenient shield of demanding a vote on the rights of full citizenship because they do not understand the difference between a constitutional democracy, which this nation has, and a "mobocracy," which this nation rejected when it adopted its constitution. We do not put the civil rights of a minority to the vote of a plebiscite. 

I will also no longer act as if I need a majority vote of some ecclesiastical body in order to bless, ordain, recognize and celebrate the lives and gifts of gay and lesbian people in the life of the church. No one should ever again be forced to submit the privilege of citizenship in this nation or membership in the Christian Church to the will of a majority vote.

The battle in both our culture and our church to rid our souls of this dying prejudice is finished. A new consciousness has arisen. A decision has quite clearly been made. Inequality for gay and lesbian people is no longer a debatable issue in either church or state. Therefore, I will from this moment on refuse to dignify the continued public expression of ignorant prejudice by engaging it. I do not tolerate racism or sexism any longer. From this moment on, I will no longer tolerate our culture's various forms of homophobia. I do not care who it is who articulates these attitudes or who tries to make them sound holy with religious jargon.

I have been part of this debate for years, but things do get settled and this issue is now settled for me. I do not debate any longer with members of the "Flat Earth Society" either. I do not debate with people who think we should treat epilepsy by casting demons out of the epileptic person; I do not waste time engaging those medical opinions that suggest that bleeding the patient might release the infection. I do not converse with people who think that Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans as punishment for the sin of being the birthplace of Ellen DeGeneres or that the terrorists hit the United Sates on 9/11 because we tolerated homosexual people, abortions, feminism or the American Civil Liberties Union. I am tired of being embarrassed by so much of my church's participation in causes that are quite unworthy of the Christ I serve or the God whose mystery and wonder I appreciate more each day. Indeed I feel the Christian Church should not only apologize, but do public penance for the way we have treated people of color, women, adherents of other religions and those we designated heretics, as well as gay and lesbian people.

Life moves on. As the poet James Russell Lowell once put it more than a century ago: "New occasions teach new duties, Time makes ancient good uncouth." I am ready now to claim the victory. I will from now on assume it and live into it. I am unwilling to argue about it or to discuss it as if there are two equally valid, competing positions any longer. The day for that mentality has simply gone forever.

This is my manifesto and my creed. I proclaim it today. I invite others to join me in this public declaration. I believe that such a public outpouring will help cleanse both the church and this nation of its own distorting past. It will restore integrity and honor to both church and state. It will signal that a new day has dawned and we are ready not just to embrace it, but also to rejoice in it and to celebrate it.

– John Shelby Spong



GalaXies is an incorporated society. See our objectives.

GalaXies provides:

Meetings:  We meet on the fourth Sunday of the month
                 St. Andrew's on The Terrace (Upstairs Common Room)
                 30 The Terrace, Wellington
Time:        17:30 starting with a shared meal. cafe style.

To get in touch with GalaXies, see contacts.

You’re concerned about what the Bible says or what some people think it says? See our list of helpful websites for commentaries which are based on the historical/critical method of interpreting the Bible.


Our Objectives

As part of our incorporation as a society in 1994, we were required to provide rules for what we would do.  Part of this was a set of objectives.  In August 2000 we looked at these again, and decided that they still worked for us.

The objectives are:

  1. To provide affirming worship for lesbians, gay men and bisexual, their families and friends who are Christian or of Christian origin.
  2. To provide worship which is inclusive of all who wish to nurture and develop their spirituality.
  3. To provide opportunities for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals to explore faith through retreats, seminars and workshops.
  4. To foster support for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals in and beyond Wellington.

Who are we?

We are an ecumenical Christian congregation comprised primarily of lesbians and gay men, although there are a growing number of straight refugees from other congregations joining us. We are committed to the priesthood of all believers, and our services are led from within the group.

We recognise common ground between Christianity and other spiritualities and their different approaches.  We are non-judgemantal and open in theology.


Inclusive language, concepts and stories

Becasue of the history of homophobia in society and the Church's negative attitude to homosexuality, lesbians and gay men experience a range of difficult problems in personal and spiritual development.

A few churches are beginning to appreciate the hetrosexual bias in the language, concepts and stories used in worship.  For the most part, however, appropriate affirmation and spiritual nourishment are lacking.

The services offfered by Galaxies attempt to meet this need and are developing content and forms of worship which might be used by churches as they become more inclusive.

They are also providing an outreach to gay men and lesbians of no church background who wish to develop their spirituality and find a way to affirm values in their lives.


Spirituality - Growing towards potential being.

For this Galaxies offers:

  • A focus on values, on God.
  • A community in which to find meaning, claim authority, express gay and lesbian culture.
  • Liturgy for the expression and celebration of values.
  • Workshops for spiritual development.